Medical records belong to the patient, not the doctor and remain confidential regardless of the doctor's financial condition.
No. A person's medical records are considered extremely private and confidential. Even if a person wants a copy of their own medical records sent from one doctor to another they have to sign consent forms for their doctor to send them to the second doctor.
No, electronic medical records are not available to the public. Anyone's medical records are completely confidential and restricted to the doctor and patient unless other permissions are given by the patient. Patient Portal is a product offered by CureMD with the EMR which is actually for the patients and doctors to check and maintain medical records from anywhere.
Every doctor maintains his or her patients' medical records.
Legally, medical records are owned by the employer of the doctor who compiles them.
Yes, the patient and doctor relationship and medical records are private and confidential. They may be released to appropriate law enforcement agencies if needed as well as to insurance companies for billing purposes.
The doctor is the person who is mainly in charge of writing the records. But, most importantly, YOU are in charge of your medical records, since you are the subject.
To his replacment.
The doctor and the patient.
There is a law called HIPPA. It is a privacy policy that states that all information pertaining to the patient and known by the doctor or/and medical/ clerical staff but keep your records confidential!
Your doctor should not tell anybody that you have herpes. He/she is required to keep your medical condition confidential.
Yes, a doctor can charge for medical records sent to another doctor in California. According to California law, doctors are allowed to charge a "reasonable fee" for copying and sending medical records. The fee is generally based on the cost of materials, labor, and postage.
Because he has no legal right to them. He isn't her husband, her legal guardian, or her doctor. Medical records are confidential, to protect the patient's privacy. (That means Mr. Rove's are confidential too-- a curious reporter concerned about Mr. Rove's sudden weight gain, for example, could not see the records of his physical exam without his permission.) There is no reason why Mr. Rove should have access to Hillary Clinton's confidential medical records, since he is not treating her for any illnesses. It should also be noted that not releasing one's medical records does not mean a person has something to hide. Most presidential candidates do release the results of their physical exams, but candidates have every right to keep certain records confidential. Further, it should be noted that Karl Rove is a Republican political operative. His job is to create doubt about Democrats. There is no credible evidence that Hillary Clinton is seriously ill, but Rove's job is to make you think she is. It's sad, but that's politics.