No. Evolution is the change in allele ( different molecular forms of the same gene ) frequency over time in a population of organisms. No equilibrium there.
True
A method that mimics evolution and natural selection to solve the problem.
It changes genes and so passes them on
Genetic variation, which can lead to evoloution, and then potentially a new species.
my notes from my class say maladaptive....
Allele frequency is altered by genetic drift, natural selection, migration, mutation, or nonrandom mating. This results in a change in genetic equilibrium in a population that is evolving. Evolution leads eventually to speciation.
As far as I know, if a species is under genetic equilibrium, the Hardy-Wienberg principle says that evolution will not happen at all, much less cause it in a rapid burst of time.
Migration affects the genetic equilibrium of a population by maintaining it.
All species have the same genetic code.
Evolution is not a cause of genetic change: it is the effect of genetic change.
Not biological evolution in the standard sense. No variation, genetic variability, and there is nothing for natural selection to select from.
Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.
That situation is called a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Not actually seen outside of the lab.
Punctuated equilibrium.
The unifying themes of botany are: Evolution, ecology, genetic continuity and reproduction, growth, development and differentiation, force matter and organization, maintenance and dynamic equilibrium
genetic drift
It is true.